Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:22:13 +0100
From: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>
To: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
Message-ID: <20091121192213.GB24602@excalibur.local>
References: <20091121145111.GB19397@excalibur.local>
	<1258816372.8741.15.camel@rover>
	<87einr4x3i.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87einr4x3i.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [notmuch] 25 minutes load time with emacs -f notmuch
Precedence: list

Hello.

On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 18:16, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:12:52 -0700, Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com> wrote:
> > I haven't figured out how to quickly tag everything as already read or
> > archived or whatever .. can someone who knows more about what's going on
> > confirm my hypothesis and if so, suggest the best approach to getting to
> > a happier state?
> 
> See my message up-thread. The only reasonable ways all really do involve
> at least a little bit of C-code hacking to either prevent those tags
> from getting put there by "notmuch new" or to make it easier to get them
> off afterwards.

Let's see if I come up with something here.

> And I can't help but apologize. I've known about all these issues, and
> wouldn't have invited people to try things out in the current state. But
> it was nice of Keith to share this with everyone. And it's nice of all
> you to come take a look at things.

Getting it out now was a good move. It had enough code to actually do omething
usefull and many people waited for something like this. The increasing number of
contributors in such a short time shows it very well. :)

regards
Stefan Schmidt