Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42511431FAF for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 13:03:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KHrDBtxqfPtx for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 13:03:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru.guru-group.fi [46.183.73.34]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33198431FAE for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 13:03:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E0E310014F; Sat, 22 Sep 2012 23:03:40 +0300 (EEST) From: Tomi Ollila To: Austin Clements , Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Annotate internal_error with the attribute noreturn In-Reply-To: <20120922161256.GE26662@mit.edu> References: <1348231837-21700-1-git-send-email-4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> <20120922161256.GE26662@mit.edu> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2+177~g6720ee8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2012 20:03:37 -0000 On Sat, Sep 22 2012, Austin Clements wrote: > LGTM, though I agree with David that this should return void now, if > that's possible. > > Do we want to wrap the __attribute__((noreturn)) in an #ifdef __GNUC__ > (or provide a PRINTF_ATTRIBUTE-like macro) or is that already a lost > cause? Good point -- this should be NORETURN_ATTRIBUTE instead... Also, http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.3.2//gcc/Function-Attributes.html states: "It does not make sense for a noreturn function to have a return type other than void." (I think that hasn't changed since :) Tomi > > Quoth Justus Winter on Sep 21 at 2:50 pm: >> Annotating functions that do not return with the noreturn attribute >> (which is understood by both gcc and clang) prevents static analyzers >> from generating false positives (internal_error is used to terminate >> the process and is used extensively in error handling code paths). >> >> Remove the return statement that was placed there to appease the >> compiler. Functions annotated with noreturn are not supposed to return >> any values. >> >> Signed-off-by: Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> >> --- >> util/error_util.c | 2 -- >> util/error_util.h | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/util/error_util.c b/util/error_util.c >> index 630d228..3cf353a 100644 >> --- a/util/error_util.c >> +++ b/util/error_util.c >> @@ -35,7 +35,5 @@ _internal_error (const char *format, ...) >> vfprintf (stderr, format, va_args); >> >> exit (1); >> - >> - return 1; >> } >> >> diff --git a/util/error_util.h b/util/error_util.h >> index bb15822..24a644b 100644 >> --- a/util/error_util.h >> +++ b/util/error_util.h >> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ >> * Note that PRINTF_ATTRIBUTE comes from talloc.h >> */ >> int >> -_internal_error (const char *format, ...) PRINTF_ATTRIBUTE (1, 2); >> +_internal_error (const char *format, ...) PRINTF_ATTRIBUTE (1, 2) __attribute__ ((noreturn)); >> >> /* There's no point in continuing when we've detected that we've done >> * something wrong internally (as opposed to the user passing in a > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch