From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
To: "W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us>
Cc: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: nmbug in the Debian packages?
In-Reply-To: <20160213220250.GB4265@odin.tremily.us>
References: <cun37t5r91p.fsf@disaster-area.hh.sledj.net>
 <87twlj8mix.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <20160208193804.GE4265@odin.tremily.us>
 <87lh6o79vb.fsf@zancas.localnet> <20160213220250.GB4265@odin.tremily.us>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+26~g9404723 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1
 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 20:49:19 -0400
Message-ID: <8737sw9kvk.fsf@zancas.localnet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: list

"W. Trevor King" <wking@tremily.us> writes:

> I'd floated notmuch-dtag earlier [1].  Does that sound right?  Or do
> folks prefer another name?

I'd like to hear feedback from others about that.

>> It would also need some tests.
>
> In tests/, or devel/dtag/tests?  If the latter, how should I handle
> the test framework?  Symlinks to the main tests/?  Copies?  Sharness
> submodule?  Other ideas?

in test/

>
> That seems like something that could be handled independently.  If
> folks want to set it up, adjusting the !command handler in notmuch.c's
> main() or adjusting find_command to fall back to =E2=80=9Cthis is probabl=
y an
> external command=E2=80=9D seem doable.
>
yeah, I guess there's no need to overcomplicate thing. But let's adopt a
git-style convention of "notmuch-foo" for script names, so we can make
it more transparent later, if needed.