Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F43431FBC for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:08:14 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.822 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.822 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=-0.023, BAYES_50=0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c9H7qCJnxgGu; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:08:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7C7431FAE; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:08:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E4CC2550090; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:08:12 -0800 (PST) From: Carl Worth To: martin f krafft , notmuch In-Reply-To: <20100108031238.GD23442@lapse.rw.madduck.net> References: <20100108031238.GD23442@lapse.rw.madduck.net> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:08:12 -0800 Message-ID: <87my0ge3w3.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Re: [notmuch] Threading X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:08:14 -0000 --=-=-= On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 16:12:38 +1300, martin f krafft wrote: > Reading is one thing. Information storage and organisation is > another. After a message is delivered (and read) to my mailbox, it's > really mine and I can (and should be able) to affix it and integrate > it into my organisational scheme any way I want, don't you think? A fair point. I don't see this being something I'm going to spend any time implementing. I just wouldn't use the functionality myself. But I would be happy to integrate patches if someone came up with some. -Carl --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLT5XM6JDdNq8qSWgRAp5fAJ9cYQrHKkqKch6QcyCELyjY59sHpACgl37D HJV4xpen8Qjxvdtf1sdQOB8= =fZav -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--