Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37521431FBD; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 17:07:11 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hjDGv6uXZqwr; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 17:07:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D60A431FAE; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 17:07:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E6F812542FB; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 17:07:07 -0800 (PST) From: Carl Worth To: James Rowe , notmuch@notmuchmail.org In-Reply-To: <87zl63695j.fsf@gmail.com> References: <1259328615-1445-1-git-send-email-camalot@picnicpark.org> <1259328615-1445-2-git-send-email-camalot@picnicpark.org> <1259328615-1445-3-git-send-email-camalot@picnicpark.org> <87k4xbteze.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87ocmmsgpn.fsf@friend.picnicpark.org> <87zl63695j.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:07:07 -0800 Message-ID: <87tyw7fsxw.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: Keith Amidon Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH 2/9] Adjust autoload comments X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:07:11 -0000 --=-=-= On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:38:00 +0000, James Rowe wrote: > I had planned on posting a patch for inclusion in packaging/Gentoo per > Carl's mail[2], but the whole GPL 2 vs 3 thing made me put it on the > backburner and I haven't looked again. Might still be useful to people > unless there is going to be a "real" release soon, as then it would be > easier to push for it on bugs.gentoo.org. Is the GPLv3 a problem for you and your ebuild for some reason, or is it just that you happened to start with a GPLv2 file or so? I'm definitely interested in hearing, since this is the first project I've let loose myself under the GPLv3. So far, it hasn't seemed to be a big impediment to contributions, which I think is great. -Carl --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLGGC76JDdNq8qSWgRAsPjAJ4jNu+7Fdk0wL3tMRP9DvLc6cX/YwCeIwzf vZhhWA9mVnxsb7PoSmAthd8= =6d/t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--