Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266B5431FB6 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 05:35:26 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ve3qoXEg+lZt for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 05:35:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from ecki.hack.org (ecki.hack.org [194.109.217.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5633D431FAE for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 05:35:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from 84-217-31-28.tn.glocalnet.net ([84.217.31.28] helo=kelebek.lublin.se) by ecki.hack.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1TVjJL-000G1m-IN for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 14:35:23 +0100 Received: from quite by kelebek.lublin.se with local (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from ) id 1TVjJK-0002jB-Ql for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 14:35:22 +0100 Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 14:35:22 +0100 From: Daniel To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 v4] lib: Maildir flags synchronization fixes Message-ID: <20121106133522.GA2029@kelebek.lublin.se> References: <20121106001633.GA14918@kelebek.lublin.se> <87d2zro4qj.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d2zro4qj.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 13:35:26 -0000 > > I came across it, having been annoyed by the fact that notmuch broke my reading > > habits by marking messages (in the mutt sense) as seen, which I hadn't really > > seen yet in mutt. I tried out the patch; it applied and seems to work. What can > > I do to make it be applied? Other than giving it some attention. I must say > > that I have zero insight in the test framework, but if that's what's needed > > from me... > > The patches need to be reviewed for correctness and style. Typically any > non-trivial patch (or series) needs two reviews. You can see examples in > the archives of how this works. They are currently marked stale, which > is supposed to mean they no long apply. On the other hand, if they apply > for you, maybe that tagging is wrong (see http://notmuchmail.org/nmbug/ > for more information about patch tagging). I'm completely new to the notmuch core (but have been a user of the alot and emacs client for a while), and couldn't really say that they are completely fine. But they do apply (with some offset) to current master. They work, seem to do what they say--and the test runs OK. Thus I have now (after having been given access by David) removed notmuch::stale and added notmuch::needs-review on the following: 2011-09-15 Louis Rilling id:"1316039001-32602-4-git-send-email-l.rilling@av7.net" [PATCH 3/4] test: Adding non-maildir tags does not move message id:"1316039001-32602-5-git-send-email-l.rilling@av7.net" [PATCH 4/4] tags_to_maildir_flags: Don't rename if no flags change And reviewers?