Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B12A431E84 for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 16:10:07 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s48-G5gnzTLA for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 16:10:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E80C3431E82 for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 16:10:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W2V6L-0004Dq-5I; Sun, 12 Jan 2014 20:09:57 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 18455 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:09:53 -0000 From: David Bremner To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] test/emacs: replace the use of process-attributes with signal-process In-Reply-To: <1389461139-20249-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> References: <1389461139-20249-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 20:09:53 -0400 Message-ID: <87wqi4kai6.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:10:07 -0000 David Bremner writes: > In some environments (at least Hurd), process-attributes is > unimplimented and always returns nil. This ends up causing test > failures (see e.g. id:87a9ffofsc.fsf@zancas.localnet). > > Historically and according to POSIX 1003.1-2001, a signal of 0 can be > used to check the validity of a pid. This seems less heinous than > parsing the output of ps(1). pushed, along with some fiddling with debian emacs packaging, as debian/0.17-3 d