Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF33340BC36 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 06:52:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.19 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q3s1gbfWjBB7 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 06:52:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brinza.cc.columbia.edu (brinza.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.8]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF0640BC30 for ; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 06:52:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-67-243-144-42.nyc.res.rr.com [67.243.144.42]) (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0) by brinza.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7ADpuok028146 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:52:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OipFE-0004HW-47; Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:51:56 -0400 From: Jameson Rollins To: Stephen Paul Weber , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Keywords header In-Reply-To: <20100806132738.GA1517@singpolyma-svelti> References: <20100806132738.GA1517@singpolyma-svelti> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-59-g0b3b2bd (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:51:55 -0400 Message-ID: <87k4nyfudg.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-No-Spam-Score: Local X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.8 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:52:25 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 08:27:38 -0500, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: > Would it not make sense to index the keywords header, since that header is > in fact designed for use in putting searchable keywords on messages? >=20 > In fact, how hard would it be to make the headers indexed configurable? Ah, if we had a nickel for every time we got this request! This has far and away been the most common feature request that the list has been receiving. It is planned for one of the next releases. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMYVl7AAoJEO00zqvie6q84ucP/2U8B8bo1WqeP5JQdHE2xLRz /ZRu1vrx95uH28xd5RAXFYTT/5qTSiBO8yFp5PydiFMSOG47tdS+hYsdzVaRHNC2 sZwxpgns0ZV7GhJIo5MkrZYo6klMgqrzutrEaF3uqssp1aph0+w0A+D4Uo61E68d A8ZVNITQI02rpSGb7XZT9klgOehriQCi6yNNI3lqif35TzD+UDqWWxD7jnzhuT+d INrw4nq3aUhVB0ab+XM9xWrX6dNrWi3CSWjQWuYIUgUJ7GgynGKpXU7DoiwObXlS OfMy7pVo7p6UnfwlVzCPXQsogLj4+MerqW+g5Y/KpLWs0sc5vUFOJ0DtY8Gb6Atu 4A6GwUohT1+bt9iqu1bHpg+HMnEYJecHqUD20mR1sGSkSMWd+zd1xY5SyAVENeqX qC4CruRO9wf0I84QT7oB8Emd+F1Ex9PsEG3SYBlWA/wfhKt1i9IBzLgVh+HQUXQ/ RaHaNC/QimoIU7TWR3PDa5a4GWhnhNcwtLC0ZwZ4W+V6SbYavCmUqwJeBO+ePY5C b/5qzlH7ovb6Sg0PPO88ZjMS8f7He41LNdveFr0Q4Zl6q6yRBBJZJbwF2IByD57H WbzdQNUpAQ9Apg3ff6IDdoJ77RcT7j/Kh6hwtp9AcjehJnJkFpX2R5xijQrPwv1A 6uwhCz0cyW1Z5Hb1PCT1 =S4Y8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--