Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E64B40DBC8 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:01:14 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rn1l2RsuF8bQ for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:01:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A053E40DDC8 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:01:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so952311wyb.26 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:01:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.28.10 with SMTP id k10mr7838536wbc.215.1289926861933; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:01:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from ut.hh.sledj.net (host81-149-164-25.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.149.164.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h29sm913958wbc.9.2010.11.16.09.01.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:01:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by ut.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E61A8594058; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:58:32 +0000 (GMT) To: Austin Clements , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Improved search speed by 2.5X In-Reply-To: <20101116161842.GA2439@mit.edu> References: <20101116161842.GA2439@mit.edu> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-6-g1e370fc (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: David Edmondson Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 16:58:32 +0000 Message-ID: <87bp5pxl1j.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:01:14 -0000 On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:18:43 -0500, Austin Clements wrote: > [1] Except for 2 emacs tests that depend on author order. What order > are matched authors *supposed* to be in? In IRC cworth confirmed that he considered the current behaviour a bug, which is to say that the authors should be sorted by first occurrence in the thread. dme. -- David Edmondson, http://dme.org