Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B103F431FAF for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 02:07:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DCwLeCnCjecW for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 02:07:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from guru.guru-group.fi (guru-group.fi [87.108.86.66]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27A9E431FAE for ; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 02:07:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by guru.guru-group.fi (Postfix, from userid 501) id 26E9768055; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 11:07:22 +0200 (EET) From: Tomi Ollila To: Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Split notmuch_database_close into two functions In-Reply-To: <1332291311-28954-1-git-send-email-4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> References: <1332291311-28954-1-git-send-email-4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>User-Agent: Notmuch/0.12+70~g598bf0a (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: HhBM'cA~ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 09:07:24 -0000 Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> writes: > I propose to split the function notmuch_database_close into > notmuch_database_close and notmuch_database_destroy so that long > running processes like alot can close the database while still using > data obtained from queries to that database. > > I've updated the tools, the go, ruby and python bindings to use > notmuch_database_destroy instead of notmuch_database_close to destroy > database objects. This looks like a good idea. grep _destroy *.c outputs plenty of other matches so this is not a new term here. I wonder what (backward) compability issues there are, though. In message id:"1332291311-28954-2-git-send-email-4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de" there was typo in comment: notmuch_database_destroyed ? > > Cheers, > Justus Tomi