Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD8A429E21 for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:57:09 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GjJX3D7GffTA for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:57:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com (mail-bw0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBA97431FB6 for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:57:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by bkaq10 with SMTP id q10so6715713bka.26 for ; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:57:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; bh=NDj+QXd/GA4Er5sj3bqHDyeeRhveIyPofH4pLYBeLM8=; b=X+Vox5ycniADD8mBOpzEruRXPDsTuFr3ubBy8InB8ASyPqjSJRsSAGJ3jUoLtR9CPS ldzQVlFHMeQgBfFZ6j6G6S0mkzJMovKcYttEOv4oCzZA1CNlMRRxAKx+EeB6PStKaBkc F8+mmpnBfOvw7g/O1S2arCX1FnMzEjhO2bki0= Received: by 10.205.118.13 with SMTP id fo13mr10305923bkc.123.1321253822636; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:57:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([91.144.186.21]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dq2sm29653600bkb.11.2011.11.13.22.57.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:57:01 -0800 (PST) From: Dmitry Kurochkin To: Jameson Graef Rollins , David Bremner , Pieter Praet , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] add `tag:' prefix to `--output=tags' results In-Reply-To: <8762in39w7.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <877hbiep5g.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <1309422029-22924-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org> <87k475mktx.fsf@rocinante.cs.unb.ca> <8762in39w7.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9+68~g5845e29 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:56:48 +0400 Message-ID: <87pqgv42fj.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 06:57:12 -0000 On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 15:00:56 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 10:17:30 -0500, David Bremner wrote: > > What do people think about this change? Personally I will have change > > some scripts to not add "tag:", but it isn't that big of a deal. > > I would actually prefer to see the prefixes removed from the messages > and threads output rather than see it added to the tags output. I think > that's the way to make the output most consistent. When I ask for > --output=messages I'm asking for the message ids of the messages, not > for search terms for the messages. I think it should be up to the > consumer to add the prefix if they would like to construct search terms > based on the output. > Makes sense to me. Regards, Dmitry > My 2 cents. I would be happy to provide a patch to make that change if > people agree to that behavior. > > jamie. > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch