From: Darren McGuicken <mailing-notmuch@fernseed.info>
To: Dan Bryant <dan.bryant@jhuapl.edu>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: S/MIME support in notmuch
In-Reply-To: <87iplrwz0k.fsf@bryandb1-ll1.dom1.jhuapl.edu>
References: <87iplrwz0k.fsf@bryandb1-ll1.dom1.jhuapl.edu>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(i386-redhat-linux-gnu)
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:51:01 +0000
Message-ID: <87aa6m6t3u.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Precedence: list

--=-=-=

On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 21:58:03 -0500, Dan Bryant <dan.bryant@jhuapl.edu> wrote:
> I'd like to report some success on getting S/MIME signature
> verification working using notmuch and the recently-released GMime
> 2.6. I specifically tested with notmuch-0.10.2 and gmime-2.6.1.

[...]

> I don't have submittable patches for #2/#3 yet, but I wanted to share
> what I found about the scope of what actually needs to be done, which
> is fairly small. (The biggest blocker is probably that Debian & other
> distros haven't packaged gmime-2.6.)

Hi Dan, nice find!  As another Fedora user I'd be happy to test out any
patches you come up with.

When you make those changes to the gpg_context are you breaking gpg
signature validation?  Or is the one a superset of the other?

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk7xyCYACgkQP1ao/7snsT6o+ACdEqowJ1Uec7mD4MPBwaQ+cHLz
KsAAmQGiMWKasLjMsi4WNSCB32HFQUFp
=+xVr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--