Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D88D431FD0 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:16:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lSq9JFb3JlmN for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:16:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com [74.125.82.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01495431FB6 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wyg8 with SMTP id 8so2038219wyg.26 for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 13:16:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.205.78 with SMTP id fp14mr1296884wbb.23.1320178601457; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 13:16:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([109.131.187.47]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fi11sm185314wbb.9.2011.11.01.13.16.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 01 Nov 2011 13:16:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Pieter Praet To: Thomas Jost , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] test: add 'Emacs' prereq to dependent 'crypto' tests In-Reply-To: <87ipn3obvi.fsf@praet.org> References: <1317660447-27520-1-git-send-email-schnouki@schnouki.net> <1317660447-27520-4-git-send-email-schnouki@schnouki.net> <87ipn3obvi.fsf@praet.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9+33~gadde72d (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 21:15:58 +0100 Message-ID: <87ehxr1tvl.fsf@praet.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:16:43 -0000 On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:56:17 +0100, Pieter Praet wrote: > On Mon, 3 Oct 2011 18:47:17 +0200, Thomas Jost wrote: > [...] > > Also, you appear to have given *every* test the EMACS+GPG prereq, > while only the ones using `emacs_deliver_message' require EMACS. > > [...] Again, my mistake. All subsequent tests appear to be using the message sent using Emacs (is this a good idea?), so the new prereqs are valid. Peace -- Pieter