Return-Path: <cworth@cworth.org>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B47431FC2;
	Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:03:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id rBxDkWoglNXZ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:03:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC49431FBF;
	Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:03:30 -0800 (PST)
From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
To: "Jeffrey C. Ollie" <jeff@ocjtech.us>, Not Much Mail
	<notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
In-Reply-To: <1258569114-16034-1-git-send-email-jeff@ocjtech.us>
References: <1258569114-16034-1-git-send-email-jeff@ocjtech.us>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:03:16 +0100
Message-ID: <87einv72cr.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: [notmuch] RPM spec file
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:03:32 -0000

On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:31:53 -0600, "Jeffrey C. Ollie" <jeff@ocjtech.us> wrote:
> I prefere managing all of the software on my system with RPM, so I
> came up with a quick spec file for building RPMS.  Once notmuch
> settles down and I continue using it I may submit notmuch to Fedora as
> an official package.  If you'd like your own RPMS build your own, I
> don't plan on offering a repository of binary packages.

This sounds great, Jeffrey.

What makes the most sense for this file? Shall we just leave it in the
central repository? Or put it in its own rpm branch? I'm open to your
suggestions here.

-Carl