To: Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>,
	David Bremner <david@tethera.net>, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>,
	notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] cli: slightly refactor "notmuch reply" address
	scanning functions
In-Reply-To: <878vl78qug.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <cover.1326551350.git.jani@nikula.org>
	<f994789d065d898911bbf127a7453137a9ba8e27.1326551350.git.jani@nikula.org>
	<871ur2jo6z.fsf@zancas.localnet> <878vl78qug.fsf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+64~g42e8f66 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.92.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:40:58 +0000
Message-ID: <cun7h0rsd6t.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Precedence: list

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 22:06:15 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmai=
l.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>=20
> Since this patches got in, I have yet to send a single email to the
> address(es) I intend to :( I am really used to the bindings and this
> change is a pain.  From IRC discussion, it seems like I am not alone
> here.
>=20
> There was a proposal to change reply bindings to 'ra' and 'rs'.  When
> 'r' is pressed an appropriate help message can be given in the
> minibuffer.  I like this proposal.  What do others think?
>=20
> If others like it, how about reverting to the old bindings until the new
> ones are implemented?

I'm inclined to push on for a while and see if it sticks. Previous
experience with this kind of change suggests that it takes a week or so.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk8UbzoACgkQaezQq/BJZRaAwgCeNNh+dNAGirwBAqQaToxYMoMX
N4gAnRuHhWC0dsypE7zY+gJ4X0EXolFe
=6NkG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--