Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D798940DBF3 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:07:07 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.89 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02z6Pp99Kd9K; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:06:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A45C40DBC8; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:06:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D307E25412B; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:06:56 -0800 (PST) From: Carl Worth To: Austin Clements , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Improved search speed by 2.5X In-Reply-To: <20101116161842.GA2439@mit.edu> References: <20101116161842.GA2439@mit.edu> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:06:50 -0800 Message-ID: <87vd3xdr5h.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:07:08 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:18:43 -0500, Austin Clements wrot= e: > 'Lo. I've been toying with switching to notmuch for a while, but the > speed of search has been holding me back. Perhaps I should upgrade > the archaic machine I'm trying to run notmuch on, but I figured > optimizing search would be a good way for me to cut my teeth on > notmuch's code. Hey, if you're going to keep optimizing notmuch, then I say, keep the old machine! :-) > Does this all seem reasonable? My code passes the test suite [1], so > I believe it to be fairly sound. Yes. It all sounds quite good. Patches please! > [1] Except for 2 emacs tests that depend on author order. What order > are matched authors *supposed* to be in? There's an existing bug with author order, (sadly codified in some current test cases). So this should be a good excuse for fixing that. =2DCarl =2D-=20 carl.d.worth@intel.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFM4tZK6JDdNq8qSWgRAoCWAJ9XJzFqPP2RDBMKV4M/dtm3wlvKhQCgn8XL k5rWplfvuJNmdHyq+0BJA3M= =G0wc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--