Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9B88429E26 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 17:54:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yjHvP72HlnxD for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 17:54:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F6C9431FB6 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 17:54:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zancas.localnet (fctnnbsc36w-156034064058.pppoe-dynamic.High-Speed.nb.bellaliant.net [156.34.64.58]) (authenticated bits=0) by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p970s7Ki026523 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 6 Oct 2011 21:54:08 -0300 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RByhT-0000dq-96; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 21:54:07 -0300 From: David Bremner To: Dmitry Kurochkin Subject: Re: output file argument to notmuch dump. In-Reply-To: <87vcs1ljq3.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8739f5tzxj.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87vcs1ljq3.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9_rc1-42-g76fdca8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 21:53:57 -0300 Message-ID: <87sjn539lm.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: notmuch X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:54:11 -0000 --=-=-= On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 04:37:56 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: > On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 21:20:40 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > IMHO 1[+2] is the way. It breaks the dump command interface, but would > make it consistent with other commands. Implementing the second option > (for all commands) is nice but independent and optional. Also, perhaps > --output, --output-file or smth would a better name than --write. I'm not fussy about the name, except that --output is taken, and I thought there might be some benefit of making options have unique prefixes. d --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQECAAYFAk6OTaYACgkQTiiN/0Um85kKFQQAj4u1BGCDiw28QyRYGDByssM/ ifrotph7yC7FhxVoSSzRyi+wv4huOlqHXWdNqUyRVKz2ZsF7aTCWTOA4pdSrn5n1 oqBPOAmzpKoUujQt7KgsO6fz4e3LIHRRwaIedxei/o2XDUAq14Empq3W/czQtpLB TYGW8R9lEpC263gdoOA= =+Bck -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--