Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7377E431FD0 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 22:27:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q6rpDgFdKxtn for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 22:27:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qw0-f41.google.com (mail-qw0-f41.google.com [209.85.216.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F588431FB6 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 22:27:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qwa26 with SMTP id 26so5571520qwa.28 for ; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 22:27:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fbqsM9TOi9pZwCKpGpHywg2av6rB1wNwFQseGKnuuco=; b=WIR+mW+w8GtbYHlmU4EwW42+Ymcedyy6PrtZZuAOFY0qXzLGot0QiA6TP3PhyMP+QU EicGSGYMX2CVczxsrNUxkC8rPe88o4SNey9jkr29Oe6NCdW7zBR/XQiYg6G4IMfHh0zl 8+XXuv/RT/Fts55EfnFhC0mw98UtFtX1W3ko8= Received: by 10.224.198.2 with SMTP id em2mr4507786qab.19.1315373223112; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 22:27:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.190] (pool-68-163-190-45.bos.east.verizon.net. [68.163.190.45]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ic19sm2079170qab.10.2011.09.06.22.27.00 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 06 Sep 2011 22:27:01 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Not much database creation error From: Martin Owens To: Sebastian Spaeth In-Reply-To: <87vct7t7m4.fsf@SSpaeth.de> References: <1315110898.32058.13.camel@delen> <87vct7t7m4.fsf@SSpaeth.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 01:26:59 -0400 Message-ID: <1315373219.32058.157.camel@delen> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:21:55 -0700 Cc: Notmuch developer list , Paul Tagliamonte X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 05:27:06 -0000 Thanks Sebastian, I'll test it as soon as I can. As a further question, I have a program opening the database for READ_WRITE access (this process provides a simple write only dbus interface) and I want clients to connect to notmuch over a read only connection. A problem I'm having is that when I add messages to the database, searching using the read only interface fails to show anything. Searching using the read-write interface shows each email message being added successfully. Is this api topology not expected/recommended/working? Please advise. Best Regards, Martin Owens On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 15:57 +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > > Let me know if this fixes things.