Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1EBA4196F0 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:16:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.89 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w7GW6+HqB+xO; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:16:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F006431FC1; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:16:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C4821568DEC; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:16:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Carl Worth To: David Edmondson , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Add notmuch-hello.el, a friendly frontend to notmuch In-Reply-To: <87ljcab6pw.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> References: <87y6gguw99.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <1271924853-8183-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> <87iq7i2aia.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87ljcaimhv.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net> <87ljcab6pw.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2-202-g01ec4d3 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:16:42 -0700 Message-ID: <874oiycex1.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 17:16:44 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:36:28 +0100, David Edmondson wrote: > > > * It would be great if point were in the search bar right when this > > > mode started. > >=20 > > This is customisable, and I see that you changed the default ;-) >=20 > Yes. I'm still on the fence about this change, (as we are talking in the > other thread). >=20 > > > * I'd like the saved searches to appear before the recent searches I > > > think. > >=20 > > Did you come to any conclusion about this? I thought about these this morning and here are my latest thoughts on what I would like to see: 1. Change the "notmuch" and message count in the welcome sentence to not be buttons. 2. Put the saved searches (if any) before the search bar. 3. When `notmuch-hello' (or even `notmuch' when it gets its new name) is invoked directly, move to the first button, (go to point-min and then call widget-forward). That is, if the user has any saved searches, then point will be on the first one. If the user has no saved searches, then point will be on the search bar. 4. Fix refresh of notmuch-hello to leave point in the same logical place, (the same saved-search widget at least). What do you think? This will give new users the ability to just type a search string as their first interaction. Users with a little more experience, (enough to have saved a search), will have easier access to those, and will not have the search bar interfering with keybindings. =2DCarl =2D-=20 carl.d.worth@intel.com On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 07:59:07 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFL1cp66JDdNq8qSWgRAnhFAJ47ikPPaemjObdrk3sqxB68AHef0ACcDnLP y6yI+qbYuLvl6KRGWHSnEOo= =0kT0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--