Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B700429E25 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 04:39:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TCkh8tVdsdu0 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 04:39:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2410431FB6 for ; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 04:39:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zancas.localnet (fctnnbsc36w-156034073093.pppoe-dynamic.High-Speed.nb.bellaliant.net [156.34.73.93]) (authenticated bits=0) by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p8DBdNDI024917 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:39:23 -0300 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1R3RKk-0007B3-N5; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:39:22 -0300 From: David Bremner To: Dmitry Kurochkin , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: reset test_subtest_known_broken_ after each success/failure. In-Reply-To: <87vcswd9s7.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87obyqvc4s.fsf@gmail.com> <1315881714-23759-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <87vcswd9s7.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.8 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:39:22 -0300 Message-ID: <87bouowu1h.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:39:29 -0000 On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:19:36 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: > > The assumption is that every test ends up calling either skipping, > > calling test_ok_ or test_failure_ and and the latter in turn delegate > > to the known_broken versions in the case where > > test_subtest_known_broken_ is set. > > Looks good to me. > > Regards, > Dmitry OK, pushed.