Return-Path: <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7060A431FBC
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 22 May 2014 01:27:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.799
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1,
	FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id qHMTvEn95KVJ for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Thu, 22 May 2014 01:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f173.google.com (mail-ob0-f173.google.com
	[209.85.214.173]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 524A7431FAE
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 22 May 2014 01:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ob0-f173.google.com with SMTP id wm4so3445587obc.4
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Thu, 22 May 2014 01:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=Ltb2idcANitXCy29qPmgmeSelv3kQw0WyZHJznruEyI=;
	b=Re8Y5vkNKhTHA3eXESsCImBmxWx+nxBGCOYSpCnXqktEO3B6eBnKknC0NY7hv/m6ou
	FBpwRzqHoiewxpzlmDBlqnDIKmgfhmU9or4Y5QOyLx8ZJBGNSTCXeTqhWoD6pc3PgFuo
	n8wpeTkpTMF7xbGe5aiqLwmziWgDlDsANdREgeJ8MC8+RG2An4Y09jILcrx3INaCTAPR
	y3Uhm0C76hbfjv4jg52hd/hj9R+WCh2vKsoc1DzUH1i2wPpNekpCSlyN/PirqiPiufo4
	hMaCqJGX+zPx1icgtThkXUtqPSmaUb5t70MIZwf1O8iqjLhwRfOck8irR9FQJSxbeAn3
	b3YA==
X-Received: by 10.60.142.169 with SMTP id rx9mr56899621oeb.1.1400747234834;
	Thu, 22 May 2014 01:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (189-211-224-40.static.axtel.net. [189.211.224.40])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
	gp4sm18818739obb.17.2014.05.22.01.27.13 for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Thu, 22 May 2014 01:27:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 03:15:58 -0500
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Fraser Tweedale <frase@frase.id.au>, 
 notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Message-ID: <537db23eacf31_1c7bd6f308fd@nysa.notmuch>
In-Reply-To: <20140521091304.GT62147@bacardi.hollandpark.frase.id.au>
References: <1399753646-3026-1-git-send-email-xico@atelo.org>
	<536e965c9415e_300d7772fc9@nysa.notmuch>
	<m261ldi98h.fsf@guru.guru-group.fi>
	<536ea7d6a4c86_3c5a8eb3048b@nysa.notmuch>
	<20140521091304.GT62147@bacardi.hollandpark.frase.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] configure: add a fallback check for zlib
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 08:27:20 -0000

Fraser Tweedale wrote:
> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 05:27:34PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > Tomi Ollila wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 11 2014, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> =
wrote:
> > > =

> > > > X=C4=ABc=C3=B2 wrote:
> > > >> Since zlib is part of the base system, FreeBSD chose not to regi=
ster it
> > > >> in pkg-config through zlib.pc. As a fallback test, configure wil=
l build
> > > >> and run a zlib version check and make sure the header and librar=
y
> > > >> versions are compatible.
> > > >
> > > > We could try to generate our on zlib.pc, this way the configure s=
cript
> > > > would be cleaner.
> > > =

> > > But for that we'd need to figure out the version, and is there simp=
ler
> > > robust way to do that some other way ?
> > =

> > I don't meant to change the code that is checking for the version in =
the
> > patch, you use the same code, but instead of have_zlib.c gen_zlib_pc.=
c,
> > or something.
> > =

> =

> [please cc me in replies; I am not subscribed to the list]

Unless the list does Reply-To munging, there's no need to say that. And
this is a sane list, so no Reply-To munging :)

http://felipec.wordpress.com/2010/08/03/avoid-reply-to-munging-mail-as-ma=
il-was-meant-to-be/

-- =

Felipe Contreras=