Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7260F4196F4 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:08:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.8 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DkOG5+xEIjI9 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-gy0-f181.google.com (mail-gy0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94981431FC1 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gyg8 with SMTP id 8so5436230gyg.26 for ; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:08:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.59.19 with SMTP id m19mr609048ybk.56.1272053328121; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.201.2 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:08:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <874oj2gebw.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> References: <1272023661-14038-1-git-send-email-dme@dme.org> <874oj2gebw.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 21:08:48 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Allow headers to be shown by default in show mode From: David Edmondson To: Carl Worth Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "notmuch@notmuchmail.org" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:08:49 -0000 I like the current behaviour, but changing the default would be fine. On Friday, April 23, 2010, Carl Worth wrote: > On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:54:21 +0100, David Edmondson wrote: >> Add `notmuch-show-headers-visible' which, when set `t', causes headers >> to be shown by default. > > A nice improvement, definitely. But I don't hear anyone actually wanting > a configuration value here. > > Would anyone complain if I just made these all visible by default? > > Would anyone complain if I removed the code to allow for th hiding of > the header? > > That's what I'm inclined to do. > > Let me know. > > -Carl >