Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE5A431FB6 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:41:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 879V6gMjjbvQ for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:41:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42127431FAF for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:41:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034082078.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net ([156.34.82.78] helo=zancas.localnet) by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UUmpw-0007qn-6b; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:41:24 -0300 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UUmpq-0004r5-GD; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:41:18 -0300 From: David Bremner To: "Justus Winter" <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> Subject: feature request for notmuch python bindings User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+73~g1c450ec (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:41:18 -0300 Message-ID: <8761zcolwh.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam_bar: - Cc: Notmuch Mail X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:41:28 -0000 In talking with Patrick on IRC, it came up that the python bindings apparently lack support for the tag exclusion API, which has been in libnotmuch for almost a year. Did I miss something? If not, would you minding adding that to your TODO list for the binding? It would be nice if all frontends had access to the same exclude mechanism since it is the natural way to handle e.g. spam and deleted messages. All the best, David