Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9708D4196F5 for ; Fri, 7 May 2010 14:17:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.89 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xtW0QjUCvVIs; Fri, 7 May 2010 14:17:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D0F431FC1; Fri, 7 May 2010 14:17:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1CCD5568E1E; Fri, 7 May 2010 14:17:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Carl Worth To: Olly Betts , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Failing test cases In-Reply-To: <87wrvjmqkb.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> References: <20100425001743.GA9293@jdc.jasonjgw.net> <20100428002615.GA10022@jdc.jasonjgw.net> <87wrvsqti6.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <20100428012547.GA680@jdc.jasonjgw.net> <87zl0fmst4.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87wrvjmqkb.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3-7-g2baa576 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 14:17:33 -0700 Message-ID: <87mxwbe7iq.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2010 21:17:45 -0000 --=-=-= On Tue, 04 May 2010 12:09:56 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > To properly do the lower-level fix for (2), we'll need to know the > answer to (1). Olly, do you have an answer on the intended semantics of > Xapian iterators? Just to close the loop on this one. Olly identified the behavior as a bug in Xapian 1.0.20 and released a new 1.0.20-2 package (into Debian at least). So with an updated Xapian, people should no longer be seeing this failure from the notmuch test suite. -Carl --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFL5INt6JDdNq8qSWgRApErAJ9e3caVcpqjlJW7WwQ+xO3+idSKbACgmoBE L9D+hZDT+Wuyk5+dkSd7wZg= =pSzT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--