Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59331431FC3 for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 04:53:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0bYgEviHdqwg for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 04:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6E4D431FB6 for ; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 04:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Va2QO-0003dQ-E0; Sat, 26 Oct 2013 08:53:00 -0300 Received: (nullmailer pid 25778 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:52:55 -0000 From: David Bremner Newsgroups: To: Austin Clements , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] new: Don't scan unchanged directories with no sub-directories In-Reply-To: <878uxgvqh2.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <20131024210837.GH20337@mit.edu> <1382650739-12438-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu> <878uxgvqh2.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.16+97~g6878b0b (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 08:52:55 -0300 Message-ID: <87vc0ktfjc.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:53:08 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain David Bremner writes: > Austin Clements writes: > >> This can substantially reduce the cost of notmuch new in some >> situations, such as when the file system cache is cold or when the >> Maildir is on NFS. > > On my desktop at home (a core i7 950) with spinning rust disks (and lvm > on luks) this patch yields about a 7% slowdown in the intial new perf > test > > from > > Wall(s) Usr(s) Sys(s) Res(K) In/Out(512B) > Initial notmuch new 579.60 348.86 14.26 217188 5330266/3501272 > > to > > Wall(s) Usr(s) Sys(s) Res(K) In/Out(512B) > Initial notmuch new 620.51 368.62 15.48 217156 5330354/3416456 > > On an SSD I don't detect a significant different (<0.5% speedup) Seems like a false alarm. Averaging over 10 repetitions, the patched version is about 1% faster. Unfortunately it points out that our performance test suite should really do more than one repetition for each test. --=-=-= Content-Type: text/x-sh Content-Disposition: inline; filename=crunch.sh #!/bin/bash test_description='notmuch new' . ./perf-test-lib.sh time_start for i in $(seq 1 10); do rm -rf ${MAIL_DIR}/.notmuch sudo /home/bremner/config/scripts/drop-caches time_run "notmuch new #$i" 'notmuch new' done time_done --=-=-= Content-Type: application/octet-stream Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=drop-caches Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 c3luYwpzeW5jCmVjaG8gMSA+IC9wcm9jL3N5cy92bS9kcm9wX2NhY2hlcwplY2hvIDIgPiAvcHJv Yy9zeXMvdm0vZHJvcF9jYWNoZXMKZWNobyAzID4gL3Byb2Mvc3lzL3ZtL2Ryb3BfY2FjaGVzCg== --=-=-=--