Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:57:22 -0400
From: Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: notmuch synchronization
Message-ID: <20101007195722.GA22464@canuck.infradead.org>
References: <4CAB8F24.7060300@cs.rpi.edu> <87y6abn92i.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz>
	<87bp777oxr.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
	<AANLkTik3yjNae+YdZ9W1mzDhfd1KJe+Pxqjbg1uMjY6h@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik3yjNae+YdZ9W1mzDhfd1KJe+Pxqjbg1uMjY6h@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17)
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Precedence: list

On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 11:51:14AM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@sspaeth.de> wrote:
> > On 2010-10-06, Michal Sojka wrote:
> >> unfortunately, there is not much news. I only separate from these
> >> patches the part which synchronizes notmuch tags with maildir flags
> >> (unread, replied, etc.) [1]. It works pretty well and I use it to
> >> synchronize my mails with IMAP server. I think that these pathes are
> >> ready to be merged.
> >
> > +10 for merging (some of) the maildir flag/notmuch tag patches. I really wan to
> > see that functionality in notmuch. I have reverted to vanilla notmuch
> > and I'm missing that functionality.
> 
> I don't see much happening in the main repo, perhaps we should start a
> notmuch-next branch or something on gitorious?

A few people had their own patches / their own trees at some stage of
the project. Maybe having a shared notmuch-next tree somewhere that
cworth can pull from would be a good idea...

It certainly should make things easier for him as he follows his "one
day a week on notmuch" schedule.

/D