Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981E8431FAF for ; Mon, 28 May 2012 21:01:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.799 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cx36CJlgjtys for ; Mon, 28 May 2012 21:01:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pz0-f53.google.com (mail-pz0-f53.google.com [209.85.210.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 091D2431FAE for ; Mon, 28 May 2012 21:01:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by dadg9 with SMTP id g9so6110644dad.26 for ; Mon, 28 May 2012 21:01:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding; bh=21b9W+jHEHxZS+r1pho5OsN8/RG4/sy5YZWeLem0gss=; b=RN0mUJehhUsvVDY1VIIhMd2wwIxtb5uQjE5zp05JW8K7wbmiK9cB71wEBxjHsDnRY6 MorAWwEdjSzWiOtR/aTTj8J2Fb6vjFh5xx2xBnZhV8lksSj8twlAoGfTmguF59fvtNT9 UysQHylmYGqqDcQ1Gz4FBrpccvWDwAkaZhc3SL4bvs5KmNDDqp7nsCGzQPw2ifNNDVTp +sz7VWjRDFoYM4eWY4hykH6tzqHZnClefTjrMZVzXQ8k1sRI+kBDC3f/x5I0LD6+NTUx lNKPcpafCbiJ5gZp8FkwQcir87j1h5PRe3bX21DI6ZuuwyTuZjE8ItMLc46YAyP9i05o i5HA== Received: by 10.68.138.161 with SMTP id qr1mr33849964pbb.37.1338264087065; Mon, 28 May 2012 21:01:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (215.42.233.220.static.exetel.com.au. [220.233.42.215]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id tj4sm21385720pbc.33.2012.05.28.21.01.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 28 May 2012 21:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 14:01:07 +1000 Message-ID: <20120529140107.GE2347@hili.localdomain> From: Peter Wang To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: search summary and exclusions In-Reply-To: <87mx4sp79z.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <20120529000012.GF2331@hili.localdomain> <87mx4sp79z.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 04:01:28 -0000 On Mon, 28 May 2012 10:03:35 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > On Mon, May 28 2012, Peter Wang wrote: > > Exclusions don't work the way I expected with the search command and > > --output=summary. I would like messages with excluded tags to be > > treated as if they don't exist at all, but currently: > > > > * excluded messages are counted towards the "total" > > * excluded tags are included in the "tags" set > > > > Are these deliberate? Especially the second point seems to conflict > > with search --output=tags, which doesn't show excluded tags. > > Hi, Peter. Can you explain more what you mean? I'm not sure what your > two bullets have to do with --output=summary. Messages are counted with > the count subcommand, and tags are shown with search --output=tags, > neither of which have anything to do with --output=summary, and both of > which accept the exclude flag: > > notmuch count --exclude=true '*' > notmuch search --output=tags --exclude=true '*' > > Maybe you can give a clearer explanation of what your issue is. > Examples help. Sure. I keep draft messages in the mail store, and tag them with 'draft', and later 'deleted'. I would like the exclusions to treat draft and deleted messages as if they didn't exist in the store. % ./notmuch search --format=json --exclude=true -- thread:0000000000009598 tag:unread [{"thread": "0000000000009598", "timestamp": 1338231998, "date_relative": "Today 05:06", "matched": 1, "total": 15, "authors": "Mark Walters| Peter Wang", "subject": "[PATCH v6 3/6] cli: make --entire-thread=false work for format=json.", "tags": ["deleted", "draft", "replied", "sent", "unread"]}] Here is a thread I participated in. From this, my MUA displays "1/15", suggesting that there is 1 unread message out of a total of 15. But upon opening the thread, there are only 11 messages visible: 4 were drafts (possibly deleted) which have been excluded. To the user, it looks like some messages went missing. Therefore I would like search --output=summary --exclude=true to report the total number of non-excluded messages. It doesn't need to be via the "total" field; a new field would be fine. Peter