Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44006431FC9 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:53:16 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.438 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rfEcJar8+Dr5 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:53:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06B98431FBC for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 08:53:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YDyUY-0003dV-Og; Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:50:54 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 12067 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:50:41 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Tomi Ollila , notmuch@notmuchmail.org, Jani Nikula Subject: Re: [DRAFT PATCH v2] modified notmuch-emacs-mua v2 In-Reply-To: References: <1421598115-4889-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <1421776424-24304-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi> <87ppa9xor8.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+27~g29ffde4 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 17:50:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87k30gw00u.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 16:53:16 -0000 Tomi Ollila writes: > > So, the question goes into deciding whether the magic of starting emacs > server to the user if it is not running -- something that many users would > not anticipate/desire (I am one of those)... > Yes, this objection I understand, and even anticipated a bit when sending the patch. So no problem from my side to make this an option. We could even even use "notmuch config get" to retrieve the users preference, although maybe that is overcomplicating things. d