Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C9C431FBC for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:06:10 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NQpk+TE2Q2b8 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:06:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from sirius.lasnet.de (sirius.lasnet.de [78.47.116.19]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C11431FAE for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 11:06:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from p5b034af6.dip.t-dialin.net ([91.3.74.246] helo=excalibur) by sirius.lasnet.de with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63 #1) id 1NBvHa-0001rh-Si by authid with cram_md5 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:06:09 +0100 Received: from stefan by excalibur with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NBvHa-0006jD-Cl for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:06:06 +0100 Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:06:06 +0100 From: Stefan Schmidt To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Message-ID: <20091121190606.GA24602@excalibur.local> References: <20091121183909.GG24944@jukie.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091121183909.GG24944@jukie.net> X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ X-KeyID: 0xDDF51665 X-Website: http://www.datenfreihafen.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: [notmuch] notmuch vim support X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:06:11 -0000 Hello. On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 13:39, Bart Trojanowski wrote: > > I've spent a few days on porting notmuch.el to vim. It's not as feature > rich as notmuch.el yet, but it's coming along nicely. The results of my > work are here: Great stuff! I hoped for someone stepping up early to provide alternative interfaces. > I'd love for this to be included in the official project, but I am not > sure if you'd prefer to merge at this point or wait will I am done. IMHO it would be best to do the development inside the main tree. You could use branches there too and it would be easier to find and test. And as notmuch is still under heavy development its not a problem that the vim interface is as well. regards Stefan Schmidt