Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5385D431E64 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:20:39 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55uI8AkalgBs for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:20:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97A34431FBC for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:20:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RroLi-0007sc-61; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:20:34 +0000 Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223] helo=localhost) by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RroLh-0004S7-UO; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:20:34 +0000 From: Mark Walters To: David Edmondson , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Bug: emacs 23.2 doesn't like ido-completing-read In-Reply-To: References: <871uqijdy4.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+137~g98adc3d (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:21:38 +0000 Message-ID: <87pqe14hjh.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223 X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) X-QM-Body-MD5: fcf7e57e9430cd9b9be07b5b8f4b01de (of first 20000 bytes) X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: - X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to determine if it is spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. This message scored -1.8 points. Summary of the scoring: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, * medium trust * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay * domain * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:20:39 -0000 On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:39:32 +0000, David Edmondson wrote: > On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 23:17:55 +0000, Mark Walters wrote: > > I have been experimenting with notmuch-always-prompt-for-sender on my > > debian stable setup (emacs 23.2.1) and it doesn't like > > ido-completing-read. It goes to the minibuffer and then it seems to be > > impossible to exit the minibuffer. > > > > I can find an emacs bug report #3274 and some discussion > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs/27856 which indicates that it > > is a problem with ido initialisation. Unfortunately I can't get from there to a > > solution (except upgrade emacs). > > I'm not sure that notmuch-mua.el should be using `ido-completing-read', > and certainly not without `require'ing it. > > Is there a particular thing required that `completing-read' doesn't do? Thanks for the suggestion: I can confirm that with ido-completing-read replaced by completing-read it works nicely. The "ido" version shows the possibilities for you which is nice, but this works fine. Many thanks Mark