Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94EC4429E20 for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 21:04:58 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.99 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.99 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BBDxTApTCoyO; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 21:04:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5642431FB5; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 21:04:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0D9BA2540DF; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:04:57 +1000 (EST) From: Carl Worth To: Austin Clements Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] new: Do not defer maildir flag synchronization during the first run In-Reply-To: <20110126150728.GT13226@mit.edu> References: <1295603977-14326-1-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> <1295603977-14326-3-git-send-email-sojkam1@fel.cvut.cz> <87pqrk10wm.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <87mxmn27w6.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> <20110126150728.GT13226@mit.edu> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:04:56 +1000 Message-ID: <87fwsfym13.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 05:04:58 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:07:28 -0500, Austin Clements wrot= e: > Quoth Carl Worth on Jan 26 at 9:59 pm: >=20 > I believe you're right that synchronization could always be done > eagerly. In fact, I believe this is true even with the addition of > conjunctive and disjunctive flags. Excellent! Want to take a whack at implementing that? And seeing if you can find any test cases that stress this more than existing test cases might? =2DCarl =2D-=20 carl.d.worth@intel.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFNQPz46JDdNq8qSWgRAoQYAKCDbd/ew2t7SLrsmQCe1McKKXnVrACdEI4b 75SPaG98IuniiDj0Uw90lPs= =Tb1l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--