Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA73C431FAF for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 04:49:41 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tbCbtCxh5QSe for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 04:49:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0964B431FAE for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2012 04:49:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru1XH-0002Zx-CD; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 12:49:39 +0000 Received: from 94-192-233-223.zone6.bethere.co.uk ([94.192.233.223] helo=localhost) by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ru1XH-0002Ac-31; Sun, 05 Feb 2012 12:49:39 +0000 From: Mark Walters To: Dmitry Kurochkin , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [Patch v2 0/4] Control selection of From: header when replying In-Reply-To: <87ipjlix6r.fsf@gmail.com> References: <1328388317-20161-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> <87ipjlix6r.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+154~ged6d37e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 12:50:49 +0000 Message-ID: <87y5shv3yu.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Sender-Host-Address: 94.192.233.223 X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) X-QM-Body-MD5: b180ffd8aa6828dd892f2d912cc73a41 (of first 20000 bytes) X-SpamAssassin-Score: -1.8 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: - X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to determine if it is spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. This message scored -1.8 points. Summary of the scoring: * -2.3 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, * medium trust * [138.37.6.40 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay * domain * 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 12:49:41 -0000 On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 10:58:04 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: > Hi Mark. > > I am not sure I like this solution. My concerns are: > > * New option looks too complex, too specific. > > * There are more aspects of notmuch reply behavior which users would > like to change (e.g. which part to quote). If we add an option for > each, we complicate both nomtuch show UI and code. > > The problem is that notmuch show output format is too limiting. Instead > of providing myriad of options for tweaking notmuch show text format > behavior, we should add JSON format for notmuch reply similar to nomtuch > show. That would allow notmuch reply to produce structured output with > required additional information, which should be enough for users to > construct whatever reply they want. > > In this particular case, notmuch reply JSON format could have > "from-source" attribute that would indicate how it was guessed. > > Now the best part. Not so long ago, Adam (in Cc) provided a patch for > improving nomtuch reply for HTML-only emails. At first he added an > option for notmuch reply, like you did for from-guessing. I suggested > him to implement it based on the JSON format instead and he did. AFAIK > the latest version of his patches is [1]. I did not look at the code > though. It seems that it is waiting for more review. > > So, instead of adding more nomtuch show options, I think a better > solution is to work with Adam to get the notmuch reply JSON format to > master and then fix the from-guessing issue by adding an attribute to > notmuch reply JSON format. Yes I think you are quite right: this would be a better solution (particularly as Adam has already done all the hard work!) Many thanks Mark