Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21BA8431FC0 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 04:44:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MV3vWZ7vlNgX for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 04:44:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09C36431FBC for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 04:44:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRKLc-00060L-Kt; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:44:21 +0000 Received: from 93-97-24-31.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.24.31] helo=localhost) by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRKLb-00046f-T7; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:44:20 +0000 From: Mark Walters To: Austin Clements Subject: Re: [Patch v3 5/8] emacs: show: mark tags changed since buffer loaded In-Reply-To: <87pplek4v0.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> References: <1394597397-8486-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> <1394597397-8486-6-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> <20140322033933.GC31187@mit.edu> <87pplek4v0.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.15.2+615~g78e3a93 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:44:18 +0000 Message-ID: <87mwgih2zx.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Sender-Host-Address: 93.97.24.31 X-QM-Geographic: According to ripencc, this message was delivered by a machine in Britain (UK) (GB). X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) X-QM-Body-MD5: fea0858007c2b9064a64c69cb1ffd51b (of first 20000 bytes) X-SpamAssassin-Score: 0.0 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: / X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to determine if it is spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. This message scored 0.0 points. Summary of the scoring: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay * domain * 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 11:44:35 -0000 On Sat, 22 Mar 2014, Mark Walters wrote: > Hi > > Ok I have something working based on your version below. I will post > once I have tested a little more. Since the diff with my version will be > quite big I will just comment on the differences from your version. > > On Sat, 22 Mar 2014, Austin Clements wrote: >> Quoth Mark Walters on Mar 12 at 4:09 am: >>> This allows (and requires) the original-tags to be passed along with >>> the current-tags to be passed to notmuch-tag-format-tags. This allows >>> the tag formatting to show added and deleted tags.By default a removed >>> tag is displayed with strike-through in red (if strike-through is not >>> available, eg on a terminal, inverse video is used instead) and an >>> added tag is displayed underlined in green. >>> >>> If the caller does not wish to use the new feature it can pass >>> current-tags for both arguments and, at this point, we do exactly that >>> in the three callers of this function. >>> >>> Note, we cannot tidily allow original-tags to be optional because we would >>> need to distinguish nil meaning "we are not specifying original-tags" >>> from nil meaning there were no original-tags (an empty list). >>> >>> We use this in subsequent patches to make it clear when a message was >>> unread when you first loaded a show buffer (previously the unread tag >>> could be removed before a user realised that it had been unread). >>> >>> The code adds into the existing tag formatting code. The user can >>> specify exactly how a tag should be displayed normally, when deleted, >>> or when added. >>> >>> Since the formatting code matches regexps a user can match all deleted >>> tags with a ".*" in notmuch-tag-deleted-formats. For example setting >>> notmuch-tag-deleted-formats to '((".*" nil)) tells notmuch not to show >>> deleted tags at all. >>> >>> All the variables are customizable; however, more complicated cases >>> like changing the face depending on the type of display will require >>> custom lisp. >>> >>> Currently this overrides notmuch-tag-deleted-formats for the tests >>> setting it to '((".*" nil)) so that they get removed from the display >>> and, thus, all tests still pass. >>> --- >>> emacs/notmuch-show.el | 4 +- >>> emacs/notmuch-tag.el | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- >>> emacs/notmuch-tree.el | 2 +- >>> emacs/notmuch.el | 2 +- >>> test/test-lib.el | 5 +++ >>> 5 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-show.el b/emacs/notmuch-show.el >>> index 019f51d..5492be4 100644 >>> --- a/emacs/notmuch-show.el >>> +++ b/emacs/notmuch-show.el >>> @@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ (defun notmuch-show-update-tags (tags) >>> (if (re-search-forward "(\\([^()]*\\))$" (line-end-position) t) >>> (let ((inhibit-read-only t)) >>> (replace-match (concat "(" >>> - (notmuch-tag-format-tags tags) >>> + (notmuch-tag-format-tags tags tags) >>> ")")))))) >>> >>> (defun notmuch-clean-address (address) >>> @@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ (defun notmuch-show-insert-headerline (headers date tags depth) >>> " (" >>> date >>> ") (" >>> - (notmuch-tag-format-tags tags) >>> + (notmuch-tag-format-tags tags tags) >>> ")\n") >>> (overlay-put (make-overlay start (point)) 'face 'notmuch-message-summary-face))) >>> >>> diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-tag.el b/emacs/notmuch-tag.el >>> index 4698856..cfccb8e 100644 >>> --- a/emacs/notmuch-tag.el >>> +++ b/emacs/notmuch-tag.el >>> @@ -184,45 +184,77 @@ (defun notmuch-tag-clear-cache () >>> "Clear the internal cache of tag formats." >>> (clrhash notmuch-tag--format-cache)) >>> >>> -(defun notmuch-tag-format-tag (tag) >>> - "Format TAG by according to `notmuch-tag-formats'. >>> - >>> -Callers must ensure that the tag format cache has been recently cleared >>> -via `notmuch-tag-clear-cache' before using this function. For example, >>> -it would be appropriate to clear the cache just prior to filling a >>> -buffer that uses formatted tags." >>> - >>> - (let ((formatted (gethash tag notmuch-tag--format-cache 'missing))) >>> +(defun notmuch-tag-format-tag-by-state (tag formatted-tag tag-state) >>> + "Format TAG according to the appropriate `notmuch-tag-formats`. >>> + >>> +Applies formats for TAG from the appropriate one of >>> +`notmuch-tag-formats`, `notmuch-tag-deleted-formats` and >>> +`notmuch-tag-added-formats` based on TAG-STATE to the partially >> >> The second ` should be a ' on all four of the above references. >> >>> +formatted tag FORMATTED-TAG." >>> + (let ((formatted (gethash (cons tag tag-state) notmuch-tag--format-cache 'missing))) >> >> Something's strange here. If this hits in the cache, it will ignore >> formatted-tag. I can't actually construct a situation where this does >> the wrong thing, but it always seems to do the right thing for the >> wrong reasons. >> >> This code would make a lot more sense to me if it were turned >> inside-out with `notmuch-tag-format-tag': >> >> (defun notmuch-tag-format-tag (tags orig-tags tag) >> "Format TAG according to `notmuch-tag-formats'. >> >> TAGS and ORIG-TAGS are lists of the current tags and the original >> tags; tags which have been deleted (i.e., are in ORIG-TAGS but >> are not in TAGS) are shown using formats from >> `notmuch-tag-deleted-formats'; tags which have been added (i.e., >> are in TAGS but are not in ORIG-TAGS) are shown using formats >> from `notmuch-tag-added-formats' and tags which have not been >> changed (the normal case) are shown using formats from >> `notmuch-tag-formats'" >> (let* ((tag-state (cond ((not (member tag tags)) 'deleted) >> ((not (member tag orig-tags)) 'added))) >> (formatted (gethash (cons tag tag-state) notmuch-tag--format-cache >> 'missing))) >> (when (eq formatted 'missing) > > I changed formatted to formatted-tag. > >> (let ((base (notmuch-tag--get-formats tag notmuch-tag-formats)) >> (over (case tag-state >> ((nil) nil) >> (deleted (notmuch-tag--get-formats >> tag notmuch-tag-deleted-formats)) >> (added (notmuch-tag--get-formats >> tag notmuch-tag-deleted-formats))))) > > I moved the nil case to an otherwise case (and corrected the typo of > deleted-formats to added-formats in the second clause). > >> (setq formatted (notmuch-tag--do-format >> (notmuch-tag--do-format tag) base over)) > > I split this into two steps. I also slightly changed > notmuch-tag--do-format so it gets passed tag and formatted-tag > >> (puthash (cons tag tag-state) formatted notmuch-tag--format-cache))) >> formatted)) >> >> (defun notmuch-tag--get-formats (tag format-alist) >> "Find the first item whose car regexp-matches TAG." >> (save-match-data >> ;; Don't use assoc-default since there's no way to distinguish a >> ;; missing key from a present key with a null cdr. >> (assoc* tag format-alist >> :test (lambda (tag key) >> (and (eq (string-match key tag) 0) >> (= (match-end 0) (length tag))))))) > > I have not changed this. > >> (defun notmuch-tag--do-format (tag formats) >> "Apply a tag-formats entry to TAG." > > We need to pass formatted-tag as well as the original unformatted tag > because we want to do the look up to decide what to do based on the > original tag not whatever it has become. Ok I have realised I was wrong and your version was fine (as the choice of formats was already made). However, I do still pass the unformatted tag so that the formatter can access that as `bare-tag'. >> (cond ((null formats) ;; - Tag not in `formats', >> tag) ;; the format is the tag itself. >> ((null (cdr formats)) ;; - Tag was deliberately hidden, >> nil) ;; no format must be returned >> (t >> ;; Tag was found and has formats, we must apply all the >> ;; formats. TAG may be null so treat that as a special case. >> (let ((old-tag tag) (tag (or tag ""))) >> (dolist (format (cdr formats)) >> (setq tag (eval format))) >> (if (and (null old-tag) (equal tag "")) >> nil >> tag))))) More importantly I was getting (erratic) weird effects because some of these changes changed tag (and even the copy of tag outside this function). I fixed this by using copy-sequence for the second let clause. Best wishes Mark > This got slightly tweaked because of the formatted/original split above. > > >> (Completely untested and all indented with spaces and probably >> incorrectly because I wrote it all in my email buffer, but you get the >> idea.) > > And I think I fixed all the whitespace > > This looks much nicer than my version. Thanks! > > Best wishes > > Mark > > > >> >>> (when (eq formatted 'missing) >>> - (let* ((formats >>> + (let* ((tag-formats (case tag-state >>> + ((list nil) notmuch-tag-formats) >> >> While this isn't *technically* wrong, I don't think you meant to >> accept a tag-state of 'list. Should be >> >> (case tag-state >> ((nil) notmuch-tag-formats) >> (deleted ... >> >>> + (deleted notmuch-tag-deleted-formats) >>> + (added notmuch-tag-added-formats))) >>> + (formats >>> (save-match-data >>> ;; Don't use assoc-default since there's no way to >>> ;; distinguish a missing key from a present key with a >>> ;; null cdr:. >>> - (assoc* tag notmuch-tag-formats >>> + (assoc* tag tag-formats >>> :test (lambda (tag key) >>> (and (eq (string-match key tag) 0) >>> (= (match-end 0) (length tag)))))))) >>> (setq formatted >>> (cond >>> - ((null formats) ;; - Tag not in `notmuch-tag-formats', >>> - tag) ;; the format is the tag itself. >>> + ((null formats) ;; - Tag not in `tag-formats', >>> + formatted-tag) ;; the format is the tag itself. >>> ((null (cdr formats)) ;; - Tag was deliberately hidden, >>> nil) ;; no format must be returned >>> - (t ;; - Tag was found and has formats, >>> - (let ((tag tag)) ;; we must apply all the formats. >>> + (t >>> + ;; Tag was found and has formats, we must apply all >>> + ;; the formats. FORMATTED-TAG may be null so treat >>> + ;; that as a special case. >>> + (let ((tag (or formatted-tag ""))) >>> (dolist (format (cdr formats) tag) >>> - (setq tag (eval format))))))) >>> - (puthash tag formatted notmuch-tag--format-cache))) >>> + (setq tag (eval format))) >>> + (if (and (null formatted-tag) >>> + (equal tag "")) >>> + nil >>> + tag))))) >>> + (puthash (cons tag tag-state) formatted notmuch-tag--format-cache))) >>> formatted)) >>> >>> -(defun notmuch-tag-format-tags (tags &optional face) >>> +(defun notmuch-tag-format-tag (tags orig-tags tag) >>> + "Format TAG according to `notmuch-tag-formats'. >>> + >>> +TAGS and ORIG-TAGS are lists of the current tags and the original >>> +tags; tags which have been deleted (i.e., are in ORIG-TAGS but >>> +are not in TAGS) are shown using formats from >>> +`notmuch-tag-deleted-formats'; tags which have been added (i.e., >>> +are in TAGS but are not in ORIG-TAGS) are shown using formats >>> +from `notmuch-tag-added-formats' and tags which have not been >>> +changed (the normal case) are shown using formats from >>> +`notmuch-tag-formats'" >>> + (let* ((formatted-tag (notmuch-tag-format-tag-by-state tag tag nil))) >>> + (cond ((not (member tag tags)) >>> + (notmuch-tag-format-tag-by-state tag formatted-tag 'deleted)) >>> + ((not (member tag orig-tags)) >>> + (notmuch-tag-format-tag-by-state tag formatted-tag 'added)) >>> + (t >>> + formatted-tag)))) >>> + >>> +(defun notmuch-tag-format-tags (tags orig-tags &optional face) >>> "Return a string representing formatted TAGS." >>> - (let ((face (or face 'notmuch-tag-face))) >>> + (let ((face (or face 'notmuch-tag-face)) >>> + (all-tags (sort (delete-dups (append tags orig-tags nil)) #'string<))) >>> (notmuch-apply-face >>> (mapconcat #'identity >>> ;; nil indicated that the tag was deliberately hidden >>> - (delq nil (mapcar #'notmuch-tag-format-tag tags)) >>> + (delq nil (mapcar >>> + (apply-partially #'notmuch-tag-format-tag tags orig-tags) >>> + all-tags)) >>> " ") >>> face >>> t))) >>> diff --git a/emacs/notmuch-tree.el b/emacs/notmuch-tree.el >>> index c78d9de..8bf2fbc 100644 >>> --- a/emacs/notmuch-tree.el >>> +++ b/emacs/notmuch-tree.el >>> @@ -704,7 +704,7 @@ (defun notmuch-tree-format-field (field format-string msg) >>> (face (if match >>> 'notmuch-tree-match-tag-face >>> 'notmuch-tree-no-match-tag-face))) >>> - (format format-string (notmuch-tag-format-tags tags face))))))) >>> + (format format-string (notmuch-tag-format-tags tags tags face))))))) >>> >>> (defun notmuch-tree-format-field-list (field-list msg) >>> "Format fields of MSG according to FIELD-LIST and return string" >>> diff --git a/emacs/notmuch.el b/emacs/notmuch.el >>> index 93a6d8b..609f408 100644 >>> --- a/emacs/notmuch.el >>> +++ b/emacs/notmuch.el >>> @@ -754,7 +754,7 @@ (defun notmuch-search-insert-field (field format-string result) >>> >>> ((string-equal field "tags") >>> (let ((tags (plist-get result :tags))) >>> - (insert (format format-string (notmuch-tag-format-tags tags))))))) >>> + (insert (format format-string (notmuch-tag-format-tags tags tags))))))) >>> >>> (defun notmuch-search-show-result (result &optional pos) >>> "Insert RESULT at POS or the end of the buffer if POS is null." >>> diff --git a/test/test-lib.el b/test/test-lib.el >>> index 37fcb3d..437f83f 100644 >>> --- a/test/test-lib.el >>> +++ b/test/test-lib.el >>> @@ -165,3 +165,8 @@ (defun notmuch-test-expect-equal (output expected) >>> >>> (t >>> (notmuch-test-report-unexpected output expected))))) >>> + >>> +;; For historical reasons, we hide deleted tags by default in the test >>> +;; suite >>> +(setq notmuch-tag-deleted-formats >>> + '((".*" nil)))