DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=SSpaeth.de; h=from:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:
	content-type; q=dns; s=sspaeth.de; b=fuiXCZ+2ZBwQL+ILtqLgnQa1ddW
	8PxZkWsg9+HEftoRrJXl+DPwrCIjom9h82Uj3tyBGJQ3RygJhziwovmCfb7WbrWT
	K2EYFTwfeA9kWrKp90ctGeVmKt64atODdnMc0x/PIygT4soUPXb9aiQOJ2CHuIYq
	IknJf53D8uVVxBXQ=
From: Sebastian Spaeth <Sebastian@SSpaeth.de>
To: Notmuch developer list <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Subject: Re: notmuchsync: handling of the deleted tag
In-Reply-To: <87hbfnmiux.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
References: <87bp7vewa5.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org>
 <87mxrcsb8a.fsf@SSpaeth.de>	<87r5gnomt2.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org>
	<87hbfnmiux.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:30:36 +0100
Message-ID: <87oc9vf17n.fsf@SSpaeth.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Precedence: list

--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:27:34 -0800, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> wrote:
> So, what we probably need here is for the user to be able to configure
> the mapping and in a fairly sophisticated way:
>=20
> 	'R' on _any_ filename  -> "replied" tag gets added
> 	'T' on _all_ filenames -> "deleted" tag gets added
> 	'S' on _any_ filename  -> "unread" tag gets removed
> So maybe something like that?

Maybe, but that sounds like a horribly complex configuration, in which
the user has to really think through what he wants (and can still make
blunders). :)
=20
> > > If notmuch gave me at least all filenames that are associated with a
> > > mail id, I could introduce a command line option "--prune --safe"
> > > which would

Right, you pushed the ball in my court. The only problem is that -- with
the arrival of maildir sync -- I lost my motivation to work on
notmuchsync. Seriously, what does notmuchsync still provide that notmuch
cannot do? I wonder if I shouldn't stick a "deprecated" warning on it.

Sebastian

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkzc7RwACgkQVYX1jMgnoGI9IgCfQG6R8xAGBmGND71POuS8Tt1n
n1IAnjyLmKZbwBzkAztVqCW4+uwNOmC6
=xDZE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--