Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B34431FD0 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:12:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Aox500fh3oJZ for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:12:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.cryptobitch.de (cryptobitch.de [88.198.7.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E754431FB6 for ; Wed, 12 Oct 2011 23:12:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.jade-hamburg.de (unknown [85.183.11.228]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cryptobitch.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB01263A2; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:12:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.jade-hamburg.de (Postfix, from userid 33) id DB8B9DF29F; Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:12:03 +0200 (CEST) To: Ali Polatel Subject: Re: [python] set rpath in setup.cfg X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:func.inc MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:12:03 +0200 From: dtk In-Reply-To: <20111012153051.GE21615@hayalet> References: <6d84224ab757d84968df4db3a7b00fcb@jadE-Hamburg.de> <20111012153051.GE21615@hayalet> Message-ID: X-Sender: dtk@gmx.de User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.3.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 06:12:07 -0000 Hey alip, On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 18:30:51 +0300, Ali Polatel wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 04:55:30PM +0200, dtk wrote: >>/me dislikes LD_LIBRARY_PATH :/ > > May I ask why you dislike LD_LIBRARY_PATH? in my experience, it tends to cause awkward side effects that are hard to debug, the main problem being that it overrides all default paths and is hard to target at a single problematic application. google may tell you more[0]. Yours dtk ----- [0]here is what it told me: * http://linuxmafia.com/faq/Admin/ld-lib-path.html * http://blogs.oracle.com/ali/entry/avoiding_ld_library_path_the * http://blogs.oracle.com/rie/date/20040710 * http://prefetch.net/articles/linkers.badldlibrary.html