Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488E3431FBD for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 01:10:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MXY9Nn9TeV2V for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 01:10:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from upsilon.hackadomia.org (upsilon.hackadomia.org [91.121.245.170]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0CF4431FAE for ; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 01:10:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usha.takhisis.invalid (unknown [151.59.176.148]) by upsilon.hackadomia.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDF6B9601D; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 10:10:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: by usha.takhisis.invalid (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6B660683154; Wed, 1 Aug 2012 10:09:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Stefano Zacchiroli To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: notmuch-mutt: support for duplicate message removal Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 10:09:40 +0200 Message-Id: <1343808582-9519-1-git-send-email-zack@upsilon.cc> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.10.4 Cc: "Kevin J. McCarthy" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 08:10:05 -0000 Heya, here is a patchset originating from a feature contributed by Kevin J. McCarthy: duplicate message removal for notmuch-mutt searches. I've reviewed the main patch and gone through various iterations of it with Kevin. I consider it suitable for application in its present form, and I've added a subsequent patch to fix the Debian packaging accordingly. Can someone with commit access be so kind of applying this patchset to the master branch? Also, if you've further comments on the patch, do not hesitate!