Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6DC431FBC for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:08:33 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZNEuaro7T8KO for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:08:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from brinza.cc.columbia.edu (brinza.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.8]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1354D431FAE for ; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 06:08:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-72-227-128-66.nyc.res.rr.com [72.227.128.66]) (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0) by brinza.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nATE8Vfv005767 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:08:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NEkSK-0001nx-Ik; Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:08:52 -0500 Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:08:52 -0500 From: Jameson Graef Rollins To: "Jeffrey C. Ollie" Message-ID: <20091129140852.GA2457@finestructure.net> References: <1259432420-27684-1-git-send-email-jeff@ocjtech.us> <1259443994-30734-1-git-send-email-jeff@ocjtech.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1259443994-30734-1-git-send-email-jeff@ocjtech.us> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-No-Spam-Score: Local X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.65 on 128.59.29.8 Cc: Not Much Mail Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH v3] Add the beginnings of a test suite. X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:08:34 -0000 --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 03:33:14PM -0600, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote: > This is the beginning of a test suite. It uses the Check[1] unit > testing framework to handle the testing. There are basic tests of the > SHA1 and tag manipulation routines, obviously many more will need to > be added. Hey, Jeffrey. I'm very glad to see someone starting to put together a test suite. They're usually a pain in the ass to put together, but definitely a very very good thing to have. > Run "make check" from the toplevel directory to build and run the > checks. I think it's usually standard to call the tests with "make test", yes? Is there a reason to call them with "make check" instead? jamie. --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLEoBxAAoJEO00zqvie6q8WMYP/38g8awmnrbOx6wS1cd4cwdt bd7Bc1NoLL14gUeDkokWkiVFPLTL4ZwfKOXPKy3Kavi5B/ml4ecVkbnlhvXcsYn4 yms0zfvHR5/bKsF2JHtSmKyZ/GKriUd1nZCRRVBORzM+r5qY/MJTg/vbkIoyV7wG DM+tSjmFGxdsO3jzvO/l4mAq1Zk9/DPduLn4uGCZDd3x1X4i93gpV3PDjYExgOdk JkEfu8pdvDYgMIIcW/mLRyqQI3KEF6gMnVGjzHnNZSArNbcIcEHx3/67v8y+k01Y eiINt540sK4fXxNeyt7OYadlHrDDZiuMb/8G/L29Yy0xXpesGM7JZhR2I6wsu/Nq 7wSErcX1WYinLCxjdX96+esisdMe7Dn0tOnccIT+dfwteagbAB5coBy8Q0O7weQT cMl+PHDzvJdCN6V+oNG1dyCRUDgjMot9njixc54JZn5ZB/VOs3h7R51Zo45Fx/3G f0cU2cP4X+RY/8awm9GLQJX1Sbsanemdh3zUgOYE6fLpeQpIkK3V18QZv98P3BQ6 LmpbnKYiVvpga2dJNF6qry5zrhNgN7hyoheZo91w5uVftoYpjjDnqVLtRs2tevq6 vG8c3Q+DzMk/gU1yDPFz9RnrSAoNXOkxEucTjhtXD33qvryhxXf5MH4NRCNeXE/J PeA4i0RE5mXpmECW8o5Q =TBDv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB--