Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769946DE1A3F for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 22:47:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.14 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.14 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.140] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R4dHlnh93t1S for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 22:47:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gitolite.debian.net (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 028046DE1A17 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 22:47:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by gitolite.debian.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMrWt-0004UV-K7; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 05:46:19 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 24529 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 05 Aug 2015 05:46:05 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Tomi Ollila , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] devel/release-checks: added checking of copyright year in documentation In-Reply-To: <1438511187-11321-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi> References: <1438508905-10955-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi> <1438511187-11321-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 07:46:05 +0200 Message-ID: <87r3niwan6.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 05:47:25 -0000 Tomi Ollila writes: > +copyrightline=`exec python -c "__file__ = 'command-line' > +with open('doc/conf.py') as cf: exec(cf.read()); print(copyright)"` That took me several tries to understand what is going on. Perhaps that's because patch-review time co-incides with first coffee of the day, but could you explain it in a comment or something, just in case it's not only me who finds it confusing. d