Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E984431FD0 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 03:32:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ECqJrigVRRy7 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 03:32:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8AC7431FB6 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 03:32:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zancas.localnet (fctnnbsc30w-142167177149.pppoe-dynamic.High-Speed.nb.bellaliant.net [142.167.177.149]) (authenticated bits=0) by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p68AWK8Z019012 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 8 Jul 2011 07:32:21 -0300 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Qf8M8-0007HM-Ac; Fri, 08 Jul 2011 07:32:20 -0300 From: David Bremner To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Proposed patches for notmuch-vim User-Agent: Notmuch/0.6.1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 07:32:20 -0300 Message-ID: <87oc15ukp7.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:32:23 -0000 Can someone who uses the vim interface (Felipe?) have a look at the patches in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633009 and http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633045 And let us know if you think they are OK? Thanks, David