From: Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com>
To: Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: Quote MML tags in replies
In-Reply-To: <20120119224842.GS16740@mit.edu>
References: <1326998589-37187-1-git-send-email-aaronecay@gmail.com>
	<20120119224842.GS16740@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+73~gd51b784 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.92.2
	(i386-apple-darwin10.8.0)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:56:16 -0500
Message-ID: <m2vco72tf3.fsf@wal122.wireless-pennnet.upenn.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Precedence: list

On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:48:42 -0500, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU> wrot=
e:
> Did you consider using point-max instead of mark?  IIRC, that mark was
> very recently introduced which, perhaps irrationally, makes it seem
> less future-proof to me.

Well, if the patch goes in and someone changes the code so that it no
longer sets the mark (in the same way), they will be the one breaking
stuff, and they=E2=80=99ll have to come up with the fix themself.  Using po=
int-max
would include the signature in the quoting as well.  It would probably be
fairly odd to want to put an MML tag in one=E2=80=99s signature, but that d=
oesn=E2=80=99t
mean that we should break that usage.

>=20
> >=20=20
> >  (defun notmuch-mua-forward-message ()
> >    (message-forward)
>=20
> Speaking of future-proofing, it would be good to have a test.

It would.  ;)  I=E2=80=99ll work on one.

--=20
Aaron Ecay