Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DCC2431FBD for ; Sun, 6 Jul 2014 11:18:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qbhChS2HQQ07 for ; Sun, 6 Jul 2014 11:18:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 547C4431FAF for ; Sun, 6 Jul 2014 11:18:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X3r12-0001N1-Ic; Sun, 06 Jul 2014 15:18:20 -0300 Received: (nullmailer pid 13888 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 06 Jul 2014 18:18:16 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Jameson Graef Rollins , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cli: S/MIME verification/decryption support In-Reply-To: <87simefkzb.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> References: <1340995101-9616-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> <1395031944-15557-1-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> <1395031944-15557-2-git-send-email-jrollins@finestructure.net> <87wqbxic02.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <87simefkzb.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1+22~gbf82697 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 15:18:16 -0300 Message-ID: <8738eepd07.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 18:18:33 -0000 Jameson Graef Rollins writes: >> >> Are we missing the signature between bad and untrusted signatures, or >> does that distinction not exist for S/MIME? > > Hey, David. How did you generate the signatures? I would love to see a > script that generates a signature on a test message. I just grepped over my mail store for S/MIME signed messages. So it's possible they're all bad, but it seems a bit unlikely. I guess emacs+message-mode should be able to generate a signed message message, I just don't know about the cert management. d