Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B71C431FC4 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 08:22:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cfX2ipceqe-R for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 08:22:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0C5F431FC9 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 08:22:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VAiKH-0007BS-AN; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 12:22:01 -0300 Received: (nullmailer pid 8441 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 17 Aug 2013 15:21:55 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Jani Nikula , Austin Clements , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Clean up reply's encoding story In-Reply-To: <8738q8jzh3.fsf@nikula.org> References: <1376667343-10863-1-git-send-email-amdragon@mit.edu> <87d2pclrqs.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <8738q8jzh3.fsf@nikula.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.16 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 17:21:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87eh9s8hrg.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: tomi.ollila@iki.fi X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 15:22:17 -0000 Jani Nikula writes: > > 'make test' now gives me: > > FAIL Reply with RFC 2047-encoded headers > --- reply.12.expected 2013-08-17 11:57:31.047782938 +0000 > +++ reply.12.output 2013-08-17 11:57:31.047782938 +0000 > @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ > From: Notmuch Test Suite > -Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?b?4N/n?= > +Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-1?B?4N/n?= > To: =?UTF-8?b?4piD?= > In-Reply-To: > References: > > I'm using libgmime 2.6.16-1 from Debian testing. > Oh hmm. now that I upgrade to 2.6.16-1 I see the same thing. It seems like something changed in gmime. I think the RFC specifies that ?b is equivalent to ?B as an encoding marker, so maybe we should normalize before comparing? d