To: Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org>, Austin Clements <amdragon@MIT.EDU>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] emacs: merge overhauled
	`notmuch-cycle-notmuch-buffers' into `notmuch'
In-Reply-To: <87wr8rc2ex.fsf@praet.org>
References: <cunpqek597g.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
	<1326710551-23122-1-git-send-email-pieter@praet.org>
	<cunvcob52ku.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
	<87wr8rc2ex.fsf@praet.org>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11+64~g42e8f66 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.0.92.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:47:03 +0000
Message-ID: <cun1uqz50p4.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Cc: Notmuch Mail <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
Precedence: list

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:28:06 +0100, Pieter Praet <pieter@praet.org> wrote:
> Perhaps we could use `ido-completion-help', like Org-mode does with
> `org-iswitchb' ?  OTOH, that would require an extra [RET].  Bah...

I'm a no-ido person.

> > Hmm, yes, that seems reasonable.
> >=20
> > > FYI: causes 2 compile warnings due to requiring the cl package at run=
time.
> >=20
> > `cl' is still `eval-when-compile' though - won't that break?
>=20
> Haven't noticed any issues here, apart from the complaints @ compilation.

If you load the compiled lisp into 'emacs -Q' and then attempt to call
the function, it doesn't complain? (I haven't tested.)

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk8UDjcACgkQaezQq/BJZRbflwCeIxBKjuk+GSGBsrb3QDXOjhlS
/VIAmgLACcdvhWr8a7tJMOm6jxFBmDVL
=ArjI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--