Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559D2431FBC for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:08:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ej+ILLrNrTW5 for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:08:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cryptobitch.de (cryptobitch.de [88.198.7.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2581431FAE for ; Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:08:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.jade-hamburg.de (unknown [85.183.11.228]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cryptobitch.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 94389509EF8 for ; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:08:40 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.jade-hamburg.de (Postfix, from userid 401) id E686DDF2A8; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:08:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de (dslb-088-075-032-221.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.75.32.221]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: teythoon) by mail.jade-hamburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3AB4DDF2A5; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:08:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from teythoon by thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1S0jeE-0000jt-AO; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:08:34 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> User-Agent: alot/0.21+ To: David Bremner , notmuch mailing list References: <20120221002921.8534.57091@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de> <20120221155312.GB30513@mit.edu> <20120222151745.4213.93513@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de> <20120223222200.17796.11840@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de> <87ehtlkr3j.fsf@zancas.localnet> In-Reply-To: <87ehtlkr3j.fsf@zancas.localnet> Message-ID: <20120224010829.17796.2317@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de> Subject: Re: notmuch as a shared object aka library knigge Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 02:08:29 +0100 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 01:08:42 -0000 Quoting David Bremner (2012-02-24 01:33:20) >On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 23:22:00 +0100, Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-= hamburg.de> wrote: > >> I've got a lot of ideas how to improve the python bindings and have >> been refactoring it in the past few days. And while doing so I came >> across a few problems in the library, one of which was so easy to fix >> that I did just that. > >BTW, it would be nice if some of the non-trivial patches were sent to >the list. I'm not suggesting any particular workflow, but there are >certainly others interested in the Python bindings, and who might have >useful comments. Sure, I'll do that before doing any invasive changes. So far I've been breaking the code apart and did mostly doc fixes, wrapped one more function, fixing bugs here and there. Justus