Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C73431FAF for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 02:51:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oDcbplZDoWKT for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 02:51:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5866431FAE for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 02:51:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wz0uD-0002w5-KC; Mon, 23 Jun 2014 06:51:17 -0300 Received: (nullmailer pid 1210 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 23 Jun 2014 09:51:14 -0000 From: David Bremner To: David Edmondson Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] emacs: Forwarded messages should not have modified buffers In-Reply-To: References: <87wqch5309.fsf@zancas.localnet> <1E19E1E0-044E-4616-B951-FC8FEFA49071@dme.org> <87zjh5usti.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1~rc0 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 06:51:14 -0300 Message-ID: <878uoouf71.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 09:51:25 -0000 David Edmondson writes: > On 22 Jun 2014, at 11:44, David Bremner wrote: >> Bah. Sometimes mail systems suck. I finally managed to apply this after >> some effort. For future reference, it was still quoted printable and >> (even more mysteriously) something mangled the indentation of the >> context lines, moving them one space left; once can see this most >> clearly on the last two lines. > > Sorry. Buried with $dayjob. Not to worry. Tomi points out above that he got an uncorrupted version, so it might even be something on my end. d