Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 074E9431FBC for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:12:48 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.704 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.704 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.295, BAYES_50=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JG9IwIKkeUrD for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:12:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from serrano.cc.columbia.edu (serrano.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.6]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC149431FAE for ; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 06:12:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-72-227-128-66.nyc.res.rr.com [72.227.128.66]) (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0) by serrano.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o1HECiNH013571 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:12:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Nhkdw-0007O5-2q; Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:12:44 -0500 From: Jameson Rollins To: Sebastian Spaeth , Notmuch Mail list In-Reply-To: <87ljes0yy0.fsf@SSpaeth.de> References: <87ska1vh7r.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87ljes0yy0.fsf@SSpaeth.de> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:12:35 -0500 Message-ID: <874olgc5nw.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-No-Spam-Score: Local X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.6 Subject: Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Simplify "unread" tag handling in emacs UI. X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:12:48 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:33:11 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" wrote: > I've been using this for quite some time now and I am pretty happy with > it. However, there is a problem with this approach as this renders the > function notmuch-show-next-unread-message useless.=20 >=20 > This proceeds to the next message, using > notmuch-show-next-message, which your patch marks automatically as read. >=20 > It then checks the unread status in order to decide whether to proceed > to the next again. So with your patch notmuch-show-next-unread-message > will skip through all messages in a thread thinking they are all read > (and actually marking all as read). Hey, Sebastian. I'm glad you've been finding the patch useful. I'd be happy to look at improving it, or of course accepting patch. I was hoping Carl might process these patch first, in which case it would be easier to know what any improvements might look like. I'll send a separate email to ping Carl about that. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLe/lUAAoJEO00zqvie6q8HGcP/1/OObcck+68fmGJslMbp5+r X1eTiSBhz5ZMcpomYMp9NrUioZiW4z2zSVV6rrEkcAb3NIP6y4aT+KZS4d9k7PUt GbCZKNTOdLq/RKFVYK8Q/PNi0OBJBIeEc3HWsJX7zs/fnKQwpjcSt2Qmj3jjUM1C v3bICOhzdqIlpDtkVOgVRspnr7pAFAhPoRVqJmliTYXseKWqLVeyNGom1emjDKYQ f3ASf7UwQ2edx0ldVuVHov6IMWUWYXgvXaL7lyuQSfQ0WpjuTtcngMORUAPt62Wb 8a/Vq/HAqhzMrsJ8j3iT+33/P9K409MT40RK7qwJr7GAO6W8eH8zXw5naMvqqm+A y/7Pucfo+QOLXxtwhZf3JX9Rj+EXuxPYSt7CMamO8AVS09C4LDmrt9d4mh5mmk38 p210cQmgqAawAPSIUkDcttbinitxWtmsI7QU8AVMHKUUURSBdnKbmPXaSw0/DrZa gvkrGniqQIVOvVspsFTlGjyEblT9LJ2HayFbo4o4jDuR5JRkOMplU/sevtOb5dVq /PnSlJ3iyqBP/6/9ZOw7zvl4s2gY9BIVm+c5dwNuvvCt7W7NLl1QRH7zRKxaoxDD 6+nJfkGKcBTdkXghrsO432bo0nsAVdv7GcsRGEoweU4dp2/3m0GjBvyc6usLQbNc 542p8ktJyPnv3rWGz8OB =ARs6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--