Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD129431FD0 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:22:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EPxy1J7LGZPw for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:22:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arlo.cworth.org (arlo.cworth.org [50.43.72.2]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ABE9431FB6 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:22:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C5A29A045; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:22:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F1E2854C003; Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:22:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Carl Worth To: Stewart Smith , notmuch Subject: Re: [BUG] [PATCH] Fix appending of Received headers In-Reply-To: <87ipszltyi.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> References: <878vu6ulev.fsf@flamingspork.com> <87ipszltyi.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:22:50 -0700 Message-ID: <877h8tqkrp.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 00:22:58 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 24 May 2011 13:33:25 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2011 12:10:32 +1000, Stewart Smith wrote: > > We're not properly concatenating the Received headers if we parse them > > while requesting a header that isn't Received. ... > I'd prefer to fix the test suite here so that we don't later regress on > this behavior. I've done that now. What the test suite was missing was having messages that actually had more than one Received header, (otherwise, no concatenation was ever used in the testing). The new test and the patch are both now pushed. Thanks again, Stewart. =2DCarl =2D-=20 carl.d.worth@intel.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk3ytVoACgkQ6JDdNq8qSWhO8QCfRTMH3JOxOOCbSY6nRWQ5mk7r erIAoIza/oCDiMeZLtBMujZ/Mx6WJ6Yj =PNsz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--