Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70854196F4 for ; Wed, 5 May 2010 22:03:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.8 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LZD-ccRm5prC for ; Wed, 5 May 2010 22:03:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kaylee.flamingspork.com (kaylee.flamingspork.com [74.207.245.61]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9323431FC1 for ; Wed, 5 May 2010 22:03:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from willster (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kaylee.flamingspork.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BBA36396; Thu, 6 May 2010 04:57:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by willster (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2674A10ADABE; Thu, 6 May 2010 15:03:14 +1000 (EST) From: Stewart Smith To: Carl Worth , Ben Gamari , notmuch Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix linker error from insufficient LDFLAGS In-Reply-To: <8739yloema.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> References: <1271974827-10978-1-git-send-email-bgamari.foss@gmail.com> <1271974827-10978-2-git-send-email-bgamari.foss@gmail.com> <8739yloema.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 15:03:14 +1000 Message-ID: <87wrvhy63x.fsf@willster.local.flamingspork.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 05:03:18 -0000 On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 17:53:17 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:20:27 -0400, Ben Gamari wrote: > > It seems that LDFLAGS have recently been reorganized, along with the > > introduction of a notmuch-shared rule. Unfortunately, the LDFLAGS used > > in notmuch-shared don't include CONFIGURE_LDFLAGS. This caused linking > > to fail with the following, > > What system is this on? I got this. Ubuntu 9.10 with gold as linker: $ ld --version GNU gold (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu 2.20) 1.9 which could be what's causing it? anyway, this patch fixed linking for me. -- Stewart Smith