Return-Path: X-Original-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Delivered-To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D879431FBC for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 06:52:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.34 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.34 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=2.438, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a+Dx4XO6bw2m for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 06:52:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.qmul.ac.uk (mail2.qmul.ac.uk [138.37.6.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40038431FAE for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 06:52:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.qmul.ac.uk ([138.37.6.40]) by mail2.qmul.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVh3c-0006wn-SU; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:52:23 +0000 Received: from 5751dfa2.skybroadband.com ([87.81.223.162] helo=localhost) by smtp.qmul.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVh3c-0007hU-Lg; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:52:20 +0000 From: Mark Walters To: matt@bubblegen.co.uk, notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: emacs: notmuch-tree, reading messages and tags In-Reply-To: <97881ceaba7c5057e21676c4102c5c7d.squirrel@webmail.plus.net> References: <97881ceaba7c5057e21676c4102c5c7d.squirrel@webmail.plus.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.18.1+86~gef5e66a (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:52:57 +0000 Message-ID: <87sidbej46.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Sender-Host-Address: 87.81.223.162 X-QM-Geographic: According to ripencc, this message was delivered by a machine in Britain (UK) (GB). X-QM-SPAM-Info: Sender has good ham record. :) X-QM-Body-MD5: 1e6bc1706de76ecbf85241efbec6083f (of first 20000 bytes) X-SpamAssassin-Score: -0.0 X-SpamAssassin-SpamBar: / X-SpamAssassin-Report: The QM spam filters have analysed this message to determine if it is spam. We require at least 5.0 points to mark a message as spam. This message scored -0.0 points. Summary of the scoring: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (markwalters1009[at]gmail.com) * -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay * domain X-QM-Scan-Virus: ClamAV says the message is clean X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:52:32 -0000 Hi I think that is a bug (my fault) which happened when the unread tag handling went in. I will try and fix it. Incidentally you can scroll the message pane with space and b without having to switch frames. Best wishes Mark On Wed, 11 Mar 2015, Matthew Lear wrote: > Hi, > If I switch to viewing a thread with notmuch-tree, I can navigate through, > and read messages using up/down + RET just fine. Each message is shown in > a seperate window. However, if point never enters that message window, the > unread tag is removed (strikethrough) from the message in the notmuch-tree > view but not from the message in the message window itself. If I refresh > the notmuch tree view, all messages still have their unread tag applied. > > The only time that the unread tag is removed is if point enters the > message window. For messages that are only a few lines long (eg a reply to > the previous message in the thread is only a few lines) and which can be > read without putting point in the message window to scroll, having to > specifically select the message window in order for the unread tag to be > removed from the message seems totally unnecessary and is inconvenient. > > Is this by design or am I using it wrongly? Is this behaviour configurable? > > Cheers, > -- Matt > > _______________________________________________ > notmuch mailing list > notmuch@notmuchmail.org > http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch