Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 12:59:52 +0000
From: Gaute Hope <eg@gaute.vetsj.com>
Subject: Re: need to call notmuch_threads_get (..) to actually move iterator
To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
References: <1456315381-astroid-1-8aih8mdal8-11676@strange>
 <1456662798-astroid-2-5i0e2mz9gz-1529@strange>
In-Reply-To: <1456662798-astroid-2-5i0e2mz9gz-1529@strange>
User-Agent: astroid/v0.5-72-gccc46dbb (https://github.com/gauteh/astroid)
Message-Id: <1456664193-astroid-0-qz0ivb5zpk-17424@strange>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: list

Gaute Hope writes on February 28, 2016 13:36:
> Gaute Hope writes on February 24, 2016 13:08:
>> Hi,
>>=20
>> it seems to be necessary to actually call notmuch_threads_get (threads)
>> to move the thread iterator from a query object, just calling
>> notmuch_threads_move_to_next (..) is not enough:
>=20
> A test-case demonstrating this (for the 'astroid' code-base) is located
> here: https://github.com/gauteh/astroid/blob/ti-stateless-query/test/test=
_notmuch.cc#L66
>=20
> At the moment, this test depends on the rest of the astroid test-suite,
> but it may be useful as a demonstration or skeleton for a notmuch
> test-case anyway.

Disregard that, my test-case was erroneous.=20

-Gaute
=